Definite descriptions, I shall argue, have two possible functions. 1] They are used to refer to what a speaker wishes to talk about, but they are also used quite. Keith Donnellan, “Reference and Definite Descriptions”. Due Feb 13, by 10am; Points 5; Submitting a discussion post; Available after Feb 2, at 12am. Keith Sedgwick Donnellan was an American philosopher and Professor ” Reference and Definite Descriptions” has been one of.
| Author: | Kegis Tojakus |
| Country: | Samoa |
| Language: | English (Spanish) |
| Genre: | Art |
| Published (Last): | 13 April 2017 |
| Pages: | 33 |
| PDF File Size: | 2.1 Mb |
| ePub File Size: | 6.47 Mb |
| ISBN: | 908-7-56374-863-8 |
| Downloads: | 76112 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
| Uploader: | Kagaran |
According to Ludlow and Neale, it is implausible to think that all of these uses can be chalked up to semantic facts. Can’t change a rubric once you’ve started using it. Alternatively, if Hawthorne and Manley are correct, the true mistake would have come in at the beginning—with the linking of acquaintance and reference.
As noted in the beginning of this article, the Russellian account of descriptions not only offers a quantificational as opposed to a definits account of descriptions, but it packs three different claims into the analysis of descriptions: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The material in the square brackets gives the restriction on the quantifier, and the formula in parentheses after the bracket constitutes the scope ahd the restricted quantifier.
But then how do we make sense of a descriptive name in a sentence like 11? Kripke also stressed that this is not really a point about conditional or modal sentences—the same point can be made for simple declarative sentences evaluated in a counterfactual situation. In the referential case, by contrast, one is implying or presupposing that some particular thing —namely, the thing about which one wishes to speak—fits the description uniquely.
Descriptions (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Perhaps the most important difference between these uses, however, appears when we assume that the description is “improper”, i. Aristotle might have had none of the properties that we ordinarily associate with his name.

See, for example, Geach ; section 39Wiggins42 ff. Philosophy of LanguageCambridge, MA: He argued that definite descriptions can be used in at least two different ways. A teacher announces the following to the class, with a single red haired student in the front row.
Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Can we do the same with the maximality claim? The question is, is there some way to answer this objection and retain the descriptive analysis of anaphora? As we saw in section 4, the distinction between the proposition literally expressed and the proposition meant was not sufficient to account for this ambivalence on our part.
A number of other puzzles remain, including the problem of pronominal contradiction, which has been discussed by StrawsonDaviesLudlow and Nealeand van Rooy among many others.
Keith Donnellan – Wikipedia
The present king of France is sitting in a chair. George Allen and Unwin,and New York: The attributive use most nearly reflects Russell’s understanding ddfinite descriptions.
The Case against Two-DimensionalismPrinceton: This question calls for an ambitious empirical research program, but we can already see hints of an analysis. Utterances of meaningful sentences may be true or false or, if here is a presupposition failure, they may be neither.
Enhanced bibliography for this entry at PhilPaperswith links to its database. Can you briefly summarize why?
Searle; ff.

The ambulance came and took me to the hospital where I had to wait an hour for the doctor to see me. Meaning, Quantification, NecessityLondon: The unwanted necessity objection. Indeed, there sescriptions some reason to think that they are merely grammatical elements for assigning case.
You need to have JavaScript enabled in order to access this site.
See Everett and Hofweber and French and Wettstein for papers on these general issues, and see Zaltafor a robust defense of the nonexistent object strategy. This is a phenomenon that neither Strawson nor Russell seems to have envisaged.
Definitee if the description is used referentially, then one might still have managed to refer to something and to say of it that it is G.
