of Clustering in the Recall of Randomly Arranged Associates · W. A. Bousfield et al. The Journal of Psychology. Volume 36, – Issue 1. Bousfield, W.A. BousfieldThe occurrence of clustering in the recall of randomly arranged associates. Journal of General Psychology, 49 (), pp. Psychol., 49 (), pp. Google Scholar. Bousfield et al., W.A. Bousfield, B.H. Cohen, G.A. WhitmarshAssociative clustering in the recall of words.

| Author: | Dugis Totaur |
| Country: | Mongolia |
| Language: | English (Spanish) |
| Genre: | Spiritual |
| Published (Last): | 5 June 2010 |
| Pages: | 468 |
| PDF File Size: | 15.9 Mb |
| ePub File Size: | 16.57 Mb |
| ISBN: | 755-3-87784-877-9 |
| Downloads: | 8064 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
| Uploader: | Gugul |
See other articles in PMC that cite the published article. By contrast, WAS derives similarity values using experimental data from psychological experiments.
First, it is important to use multiple measures of semantic similarity if one is to obtain an accurate estimate of whether participants are semantically clustering their recalls. Oscillatory patterns in temporal lobe reveal context reinstatement during memory bousfiled.

The same 5, randomly chosen item lists were used in both panels. The order in which participants choose to recall words from a studied list of randomly selected words provides insights into how memories of the words are represented, organized, and retrieved.
Results We ran two batches of simulations. Suppose the simulated participant has just studied a list of n words. Footnotes 1 Here the functions f and g p are mappings bouefield two words, a and bonto scalar similarity values.
Associative retrieval processes in free recall. By contrast, measuring semantic clustering requires making assumptions about what each word means to each participant.
We generated 5-item recall bousfielv that maximized the WAS-derived semantic clustering score forsimulated participants presented with 50 item lists each see text for details. In the present manuscript we use simulations to study these questions. A semantic clustering score of 0. The semantic clustering score, developed by Polyn et al.

PhD Dissertation in Neuroscience. We chose the two semantic similarity metrics as representative examples from the broader range of metrics discussed in the introduction.
Because this procedure ensures that each recall will be followed by the most similar word that is yet to be recalled, by definition it will maximize the semantic clustering score according to g p.
We then measure the degree of semantic clustering according to a different similarity metric, f. This panel shows a binned bousifeld of the scatterplot in panel C.
Interpreting semantic clustering effects in free recall
Author manuscript; available in PMC Jul 1. Journal of Experimental Psychology. There is some evidence that similarities in the neural patterns evoked by thinking about a given pair of words predict the tendencies of participants to successively recall the words, given that both appeared on the studied lists Manning, LSA represents one technique for deriving similarity values via automated text processing.
Rather, we simply found the semantic clustering score toprovide a convenient means of quantifying semantic clustering. This shows that even participants who exhibit strong semantic clustering may still show clustering scores near 0.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
Across thesimulated recall sequences, and combining across the two semantic similarity measures, the observed semantic clustering scores ranged from 0. Support Center Support Center. This tendency to successively recall semantically related words is termed semantic clustering Bousfield and Sedgewick, ; Bousfield, ; Cofer 195 al.
We quantify the degree of semantic clustering using the semantic clustering score Polyn et al. We expect that these biases are related to the form of the semantic similarity distributions derived from each measure see Fig.
One pervasive finding is that when a pair of semantically related words e. We used the set of pairwise similarities for this set of highly imageable nouns in our simulations. Introduction The free recall paradigm has participants study lists of bousfieod — typically words — and subsequently recall the studied items in the order they come to mind.
We select the word with the highest semantic similarity as the next recall, i 2and remove i 2 from the pool. Gamma oscillations distinguish true from false memories. Semantic clustering score The semantic clustering score, developed by Polyn et 19553.
Our simulations yield four bousfiled insights into the interpretation of semantic clustering during free recall. A neurosemantic theory of concrete noun representation based on underlying brain codes.
